Clinical practice of minimally invasive gynaecological surgeries


Aims: This study was done to know the clinical practice of minimally invasive gynaecological surgeries in Minimally Invasive Diagnostic and Therapeutic (MIDAT) hospital.Methods: A hospital based descriptive study was conducted in gynaecological department of MIDAT hospital over 16 months period from 1st Bhadra 2071 to 30th Poush 2072 (17th August 2014 to 14th January 2016) among 115 women who underwent minimally invasive gynaecological surgeries (MIGS).Results: There were total 115 minimally invasive gynaecological surgeries done in MIDAT hospital during study period. Laparoscopic gynaecological surgeries and hysteroscopy were performed in 86 (75%) and in 29 (25%) women respectively. Among laparoscopy, laparoscopic hysterectomy {31 (36%)} was the more common operation. During laparoscopy, conversion to open was done in nine (10.5%) patients. Complications of MIGS were seen in three (3.5%) women.Conclusions: MIGS has got more technical difficulties but lesser morbidity, better patient’s satisfaction, smooth post operative recovery and shorter hospital stay compared to open gynaecological surgeries. In recent time, MIGS is gradually becoming popular in Nepal.Keywords: Hysteroscopy, Minimally invasive gynaecological surgery, laparoscopy

Author Biography

binaya raj bhandari, MIDAT Hospital Lagankhel, Lalitpur, Nepal
Obstetrics and gynaecologyconsultant and HOD


1. Sharp HT, Francis SL, Murphy AA. Diagnostic and operative laparoscopy. In: Rock JA, Jones III HW, editors. Te Linde’s Operative Gynaecology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer; 2008. p. 319.
2. Baggish MS. Operative hysteroscopy. In: Rock JA, JONES III HW, editors. Te Linde’s Operative Gynaecology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer; 2008. p. 336.
3. Merrill RM. Hysterectomy surveillance in United States, 1997 through 2005. Med Sci Monit. 2008; 14: CR 24-31.
4. Ishik-Akbay EF, Harmanill OH, Panganamamula UR, Aby M, Gaughan J, Chatwani AJ. Hysterectomy in obese women: a comparison of abdominal and vaginal routes. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104:710-4.
5. Marana R, Busacca M, Zupi E, Garcea N, Paprella P, Catalano GF. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 180:270-5.
6. McCracken G, Hunter D, Morgan D, Price JH. Comparison of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy. Ulster Med J. 2006; 75:54-8.
7. Balci O. Comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 4:224-7.
8. Allameh T, Mohammadizadeh F. Diagnostic value of hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding compared to pathology reports. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 2007; 15(20):61-4.
9. Shawki O, Soliman I, Ebrashy A. Laparoscopic management of ovarian dermoid cyst. Middle East Fertility Society Journal.2004; 9(1):58-65.
10. Bajracharya J, Shrerstha NS, Karki C, Saha R. Laparoscopic findings in chronic pelvic pain. Journal of Kathmandu Medical College. 2012; 1(2):100-2.
11. Saha R, Karki C. Laparoscopic management of benign ovarian masses. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2013; 52(192):608-11.
12. Parkar RB, Thagana NG, Baraza R, Otieno D. Experience with laparoscopic surgery at the AGA Khan hospital, Nairobi. East African Medical Journal. 2003; 8(1):44-50.
13. Fard SA, Ebrahimi FS, Montazeri F, Mashrabi O. Diagnostic features and therapeutic consequences of hysteroscopy in women with abnormal uterine bleeding and abortion. American Journal of Applied sciences. 2012; 9(1):13-7.
14. Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, Ulzen KV, Hermans JO, Trimbos JB, Trimbo-Kemper TCM. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 96(2):266-70.
15. O’Hanlan KA, Dibble SL, Garnier AC, Reuland ML. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and complications of 830 cases. JSLS. 2007; 11:45-53.
16. Mortan M, Cheung VYT, Rosenthal DM. Total laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy: A retrospective comparison. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008; 30(11):1039-44.
How to Cite
BHANDARI, binaya raj. Clinical practice of minimally invasive gynaecological surgeries. J Soc Surg Nep, [S.l.], v. 21, n. 2, p. 19-23, mar. 2019. ISSN 2392-4772. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 08 aug. 2020.
Original Article


hysteroscopy, minimally invasive gynaecological surgery, laparoscopy